ASC 12/09

University of Glasgow

Academic Standards Committee - Friday 5 October 2012

Revised Guidance on the Structure and Contents of the Annual Report from Validated Institutions to the University of Glasgow

Cover Sheet

Wendy E Muir, Assistant Director of Senate Office

 
Brief description of the paper 

Proposed revisions to the guidance on the structure and contents of the Annual Report from Validated Institutions to the University. The revised guidance places more emphasis on self reflection and the critical evaluation of the operation of validated programmes and the learning experience of students, with the aim of producing a more streamlined and focused report. This should facilitate more useful discussions at Liaison Committee and Joint Board meetings. This revised approach is designed to be consistent with the Scottish enhancement-led approach to quality as set out in the Quality Enhancement Framework, which includes Enhancement-led Institutional Review (ELIR).

Action Requested 

ASC is asked to consider and approve the proposed revisions to the guidance on the structure and contents of the Annual Report from Validated Institutions to the University.

Recommended Person/s responsible for taking action(s) forward 

Staff in the Collaborations Unit, Senate Office.

Resource implications 

A more focused and streamlined report should result in the more effective use of University staff time in reviewing the annual report. As HEIs in their own right (and therefore subject to ELIR), the Glasgow School of Art and SAC should be more accustomed to a reflective and critical approach. Christie’s Education and the Free Church College will have less experience and are likely to require additional support and time to adapt to the revised approach.

Timescale for Implementation 

With immediate effect so that the annual reports for 2011-12 are presented in the new format. As noted above, it should be recognised that it is likely to be an iterative process in the case of Christie’s Education and the Free Church College.

Equality implications 

None identified.

 

Prepared by: Karen Robertson